One of the things I don’t like about that story that emerged recently, concerning Cormac McCarthy, is that it provides me with more evidence that I am not the right kind of guy—or, rather, that the kind of guy I have chosen to be doesn't suit me. Every guy who exists, you see, has to be a certain kind of guy. It is mandatory. If a guy somewhere doesn't fit readily into one of the available categories, and/or if he hasn't adjusted himself so that he fits into one of the preestablished roles the world has for guys, then a guy type will be assigned to him. It will be whichever one he most closely resembles, based on the traits he exhibits.The good news is that there are lots of types of guys a guy can be, or be considered to be. There are jocks, former jocks, incels, comic book guys, vinyl record guys, comatose guys, egomaniacs, Harvey Weinstein types, sensitive guys, pretend-sensitive guys, Guy Pearce, and many more. These guy roles can overlap; Harvey Weinstein, the original Harvey Weinstein type, appears to have occasionally been pretend-sensitive. For all I know, he was also a collector of vinyl records, and was therefore one of those guys as well.The bad news is, there is only one variety of guy writer: the insufferable guy writer. Every guy who invests in writing enough to be considered "a writer" is assigned the role of insufferable guy writer. It doesn't matter if he is not actually insufferable, or if he is like me and is quite insufferable but not as much as certain other people. If he is a guy and he writes, he will always be considered to be, to one extent or another, an insufferable guy writer.If you don’t believe me, it’s possible that I am wrong about this, and that this is stupid. If that’s the case, you’re not allowed to get mad at me, about this or anything else. But you may recall an account on a website that was once called “Twitter.” It was the “Guy in your MFA” Twitter account, and someone at The Rumpus wrote about it at some length in 2018. The Twitter account featured a stream of annoying statements that sounded like they would come from an insufferable guy writer in the context of an MFA program. The Rumpus article I’ve linked to attests to how accurate a depiction of the MFA guy the Twitter account was—and how the real-life MFA guys, the insufferable writer guys, while laughing at the Twitter account, and getting all of the jokes, still managed to be insufferable. If you’re a guy or anything like one, and you also write, there is no escaping the insufferable guy writer. He is what you will be considered to be, no matter what you do.Do I like that this is how it is? No. Am I complicit in it? Yes. I have been guilty in my life of thinking guy writers are insufferable when they’re possibly not. In fact, the reason it took so long for me to start taking writing seriously, to engage in it as an artmaking endeavor, rather than something I did for literature seminars, was that every guy writer I met for many years was a card-carrying insufferable guy writer. They checked every box: they were arrogant; they didn't listen; they thought the world of themselves; they behaved as if they had arrived at their destinations already and were sighing into their clove cigarettes as they waited for the rest of us to catch up. I didn't want to be like them, so I didn't do what they did. I refrained from writing until I could not take it anymore. The dam burst, the writing began, and here I am, carrying on with it, growing more insufferable by the sentence.I did, eventually, meet some good writer guys. I didn't think they were insufferable, and I came to believe I could make myself into a guy writer who was all right to be around. What I didn't realize was that it didn't matter if I knew some good guy writers, and tried to be one myself. I would always represent the insufferable guy writer archetype, because that is the only guy writer archetype there is. Every guy writer is an insufferable guy writer. All that you can do is modulate the degree to which other people think you are insufferable.Am I saying things are easier for women writers? No, I am not saying that. I think everything is hard for everyone, and although I have been using he/him pronouns for guy roles, I don’t think they’re gender-specific. Anyone can be a kind of guy, whether it’s a pretend-sensitive guy or a shy artist guy. It doesn’t matter who you are. I am also fairly certain that the second Beetlejuice movie was originally written to be a TV show. The way the story played out seemed awfully episodic to me. Every major character gets their own fifteen or twenty minutes, the way in a prestige TV show they would get their own episode. I liked the movie, but that dimension of it bothered me. I don’t like it when I think I can see through a movie and identify what it was like in an earlier draft.And I’ve been having unrelated fun with The Death Generator, which is the source of most of the images...
Show More
Show Less