Listen free for 30 days
Listen with offer
-
The Myth of Disenchantment
- Magic, Modernity, and the Birth of the Human Sciences
- Narrated by: Chris MacDonnell
- Length: 16 hrs and 9 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £16.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Summary
A great many theorists have argued that the defining feature of modernity is that people no longer believe in spirits, myths, or magic. Jason A. Josephson-Storm argues that as broad cultural history goes, this narrative is wrong, as attempts to suppress magic have failed more often than they have succeeded. Even the human sciences have been more enchanted than is commonly supposed. But that raises the question: How did a magical, spiritualist, mesmerized Europe ever convince itself that it was disenchanted?
Josephson-Storm traces the history of the myth of disenchantment in the births of philosophy, anthropology, sociology, folklore, psychoanalysis, and religious studies. Ironically, the myth of mythless modernity formed at the very time that Britain, France, and Germany were in the midst of occult and spiritualist revivals. Indeed, Josephson-Storm argues, these disciplines' founding figures were not only aware of, but profoundly enmeshed in, the occult milieu; and it was specifically in response to this burgeoning culture of spirits and magic that they produced notions of a disenchanted world.
By providing a novel history of the human sciences and their connection to esotericism, The Myth of Disenchantment dispatches with most widely held accounts of modernity and its break from the premodern past.
What listeners say about The Myth of Disenchantment
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Cundrie
- 15-08-24
Encyclopaedic
I was enchanted and educated by the scholarship and lovely writing of this excellent book, although unconvinced by its deconstructive argument that disenchantment is a myth. The book is beautifully read, but would be better if the reader didn’t mangle the many French and German quotations.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Patrick Trompiz
- 20-07-21
Full of suggestive ideas
Many great plusses: he writes/speaks extremely clearly, perfect for listening and walking. He draws on writers from Frankfurt school and French postmodern school in a crystal clear way, which is very rare. He makes a strong case for including biographies in academic work. His basic arguments are challenging to many ideas about modernity: 1. (On Elites) the biographies of great scientists and scholars are full of interest in magic and the supernatural where we would least expect it, like the Curies or logical positivists. 2. (Non elites) Ordinary people do believe in supernatural phenomena despite the enlightenment, industrial revolution etc. The minus I found (much less a weakness than it sounds) was that he does not really establish his main claim that disenchantment is a myth. ok so many people believe today in magic, but perhaps it is that they ONLY believe? He doesn't ask what depth of conviction is expressed by saying you believe in ghosts to a telemarketer. And then on Weber, the culmination of the book, it's surprising how little of Weber is affected by Storm's arguments: Weber discusses modern western phenomena eg classical music in such careful detail and with so little dogma that Josephson Storm's more one-sided arguments dont seem to touch him much. Eg Weber tries to capture our amazement at both the rational system and the irrational aspects of ("western" or "global") classical music. Even if many of the players and audience members go and play tarot cards after the concert, there is still a striking phenomenon to understand... As for the fact that elites, scientists, intellectuals, are very open to unexplained phenomena - that is how it should be (Storm consciously avoids evaluating, but this has its risks), scientists are much less dogmatic than their fans often are. But does that mean that disenchantment hasn't happened at all? In any case, Ill definitely be reading it again :)
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
1 person found this helpful