The Non-Prophets

By: Atheist Community of Austin
Listen for free

  • Summary

  • And we are The Non-Prophets!... airing on the first and third Sunday of every month, starting at 3:00 PM Central (01:30-03:00 UTC) on our Youtube channel: https://www.youtube.com/thenonprophetsaca. The Non-Prophets focuses on atheism and the separation of church and state.

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Copyright Atheist Community of Austin
    Show More Show Less
Politics & Government
Show More Show Less
activate_samplebutton_t1
Episodes
  • Christians Deny Faith, Rebranding the Doctrine

    Christians Deny Faith, Rebranding the Doctrine
    Sep 18 2024
    Stand to Reason, By Greg Koukl, on August 1, 2024

    https://www.str.org/w/it-s-time-to-forget-faith-

    In this discussion, Greg Koukl proposes a redefinition of "faith" to better align with rational and evidence-based thinking. Koukl suggests that faith should be understood as "confident convictions based on good reasons" rather than as mere belief without evidence. His goal is to reshape the perception of faith, framing it as a position supported by logical and rational foundations. This redefinition aims to counter the common criticism that faith is irrational or unsupported by evidence.

    The panel’s reactions to Koukl’s argument reflect a range of perspectives. Damian criticizes Koukl’s approach by arguing that renaming faith does not address the underlying issue of evidence. He suggests that believers often shift the conversation away from substantial evidence to unrelated topics, such as evolutionary theory or cosmology, to avoid engaging with the core issue of evidence supporting their beliefs.

    Aaron adds to the critique by questioning Koukl’s "three pillars" of active trust: reliable evidence, reliable witnesses, and convincing proofs. He argues that historical evidence supporting Christianity is often lacking and inconsistent, challenging the adequacy of these pillars in substantiating faith claims. Aaron’s position highlights the difficulty of relying on these pillars when the evidence is not robust or comprehensive.

    AJ also questions the efficacy of Koukl’s redefinition. He sees it as a superficial rebranding that does not solve the deeper issue of insufficient evidence. AJ argues that changing the definition of faith does not address the fundamental problems of evidence and reason that believers face. He raises concerns about why believers resist the term "faith" if it truly reflects their belief process and whether the redefinition genuinely addresses the criticisms of faith.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.2 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    22 mins
  • Women's Health Neglected in Texas. Again.

    Women's Health Neglected in Texas. Again.
    Sep 16 2024
    El Paso mom won’t get damages for unexpected pregnancy after believing her tubes were tied

    KERA News, By Toluwani Osibamowo, on May 10, 2024

    https://www.keranews.org/health-wellness/2024-05-10/el-paso-mother-medical-negligence-texas-supreme-court

    Texas GOP Wants a Horrifying Punishment for Abortion, IVF Patients

    The New Republic by Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling on April 1, 2024

    The discussion today highlights two major issues in Texas regarding women's health. The first story is about Gel Vasco, a woman who was unaware her tubes had not been tied despite paying for the procedure. She was refused compensation for her unexpected pregnancy, receiving only a $400 refund. The second story stems from a leaked meeting with the organization Abolish Abortion Texas, where the group’s director, Paul Brown, outlined plans to classify abortion and the destruction of IVF embryos as murder, potentially punishable by the death penalty. This signals a return to more regressive views on women's health, akin to laws from the 1800s. These stories, discussed in articles from Kira News and New Republic, reflect a clear bias against pregnant women in Texas, where women's lives seem to be secondary to those of their unborn children.

    Justice Rebecca Huddle ruled that a healthy child is not an "injury" and refused compensation for Vasco's pregnancy, suggesting that carrying a healthy baby to term cannot be considered a harmful event. However, one panelist pointed out that pregnancy comes with significant physical strain, risk, and even accelerated cellular aging, which contradicts the notion that it causes no harm. Despite these realities, the Texas Supreme Court's stance reflects a broader dismissal of the health and autonomy of women in the state's healthcare system.

    As the discussion unfolded, it became clear that the state's policies are increasingly forcing women into situations where they must prioritize the life of the unborn over their own. Panelists critiqued Texas' punitive stance, particularly toward women and doctors, and noted the hypocrisy of the state’s claim to value life, while advocating for the death penalty in cases of abortion. This ongoing conflict between women's rights and state control over their bodies leaves many in Texas in a precarious and often dangerous position.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.37.1 featuring Infidel 64, AJ, Damien H and Aaron Jensen

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    26 mins
  • Are Conservatives Losing the Culture Wars?

    Are Conservatives Losing the Culture Wars?
    Sep 14 2024
    Are Republicans losing the culture wars?

    Politico, By Juan Perez Jr, on 2024-08-24

    https://www.politico.com/news/2024/08/24/republicans-culture-war-races-00176166

    In a recent discussion about the culture wars and their impact on the Republican Party, several key points emerged. The conversation, which took place on August 24, 2024, highlights how conservatives might be losing ground in the culture wars, particularly in education. The focus has shifted from policy to cultural issues, with an increasing emphasis on topics like book bans and "woke" ideology. This shift is seen as a strategic move to rally base support by engaging emotions rather than addressing substantive policy issues.

    The conversation criticized the Republican Party's reliance on culture wars as a distraction from unpopular or nonexistent policies. Instead of focusing on essential needs such as educational funding and teacher retention, the party has prioritized divisive issues that generate emotional responses. This approach is criticized for being a form of manipulation, designed to keep the base engaged without offering real solutions to the country's pressing problems.

    Participants in the discussion noted that while the culture wars might energize some voters, they often do so at the expense of addressing fundamental educational needs. The use of terms like "freedom" and "liberty" in the context of these culture wars was described as misleading, serving more as propaganda to divert attention from the lack of effective policies.

    The impact on education is significant. By focusing on culture wars rather than practical needs, such as proper funding and the retention of quality educators, the system risks worsening. Teachers are leaving the profession due to underfunding and poor working conditions, which ultimately affects the quality of education that students receive. The conversation argued that this approach harms both educators and students, as it emphasizes ideological battles over practical improvements.

    Overall, the discussion suggests that the focus on cultural issues is a strategic move by Republicans to maintain political power by leveraging emotional debates, even though this may undermine more pressing concerns in education and governance.

    The Non-Prophets, Episode 23.36.4 featuring Cynthia McDonald, Jonathan Roudabush,Scott Dickie and Cindy Plaza

    Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-non-prophets--3254964/support.
    Show More Show Less
    21 mins

What listeners say about The Non-Prophets

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.co.uk reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available