In this podcast, Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling discuss the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in Blackfriars Hotel applying an anti-avoidance provision in the loss relief regime to a loss-refreshing transaction reminiscent of the Kwik-Fit unallowable purpose case.

They also discuss the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in Grint on the sale of occupational income rules (which had been used by HMRC as an alternative argument in the BlueCrest, HFFX and BCG partnership remuneration cases) and the Court of Appeal’s decision in Refinitiv, a judicial review case concerning the compatibility of diverted profits tax notices with a prior advance pricing agreement.

They are then joined by Tax Associate Kasim Mehmood for a discussion of the Supreme Court’s approach to interpreting tax legislation in Cobalt Data Centre and changes to HMRC’s capital gains manual in respect of the reorganisation rules.

The podcast also covers PISCES, a proposed new type of regulated trading platform for private shares, and what 2025 might bring in terms of UK, EU and US tax developments, including (in case of the UK) various consultations on changes to the transfer pricing rules as well as potential enquiry activity in this area.

In this special episode of our Tax News podcast, Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling asked Arvind Ravichandran, Tax Partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, what U.S. tax policy may look like during a second Trump Administration.

During the episode, we cover:

• The significance of the Republican Party achieving a “trifecta” in the November 2024 elections.
• How tax legislation can be passed by simple majority vote through the Budget Reconciliation process.
• What policy proposals could be on the table and how you can look out for clues as the incoming Administration’s policies develop.

Listen to the podcast to learn more about what might happen next on U.S. tax policy.

In this podcast, Catrin Young, Senior Professional Support Lawyer in the Pensions Team, joins Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling to discuss the government’s policy decision at the Autumn Budget to bring unused pension savings and death benefits into the scope of inheritance tax (with the charge to be administered by pension trustees), and HMRC’s recent clarification that the authorised surplus payment charge payable by the trustees of a defined benefits scheme when returning a surplus to an employer is to be calculated by reference to the gross amount of the surplus (rather than the amount received by the employer).

Zoe and Tanja also discuss the increase in late payment interest from April 2025, two updates to HMRC guidance, the UK expert panel’s report on a potential corporate re-domiciliation regime and certain international developments.

The podcast further covers three UK cases: the First-tier Tribunal’s decision in Syngenta, denying interest deductions for a loan created in an intra-group reorganisation under the unallowable purpose rule in section 441 of the Corporation Tax Act 2009, and the Upper Tribunal’s decisions in Gould on the tax point for an interim dividend where two shareholders were paid around eight months apart, and in Panayi on conforming interpretation.

In this podcast, tax associate Alex Sim joins Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling to discuss the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Muller on the interaction of certain provisions in the intangible fixed assets regime with the rules on the taxation of partnerships.

Zoe and Tanja also discuss the CJEU’s decisions in the Apple and UK CFC rules State aid cases, the Supreme Court’s decision in Professional Game Match Officials Limited on employment status and the stamp duty land tax case Brindleyplace in which the First-tier Tribunal employed purposive construction in favour of the taxpayer.

In this podcast, Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling highlight points related to the Chancellor’s statement on public spending inheritance. They also discuss updated HMRC guidance on the multinational top-up tax and domestic top-up tax and comments from the business community.

Before moving on to HMRC statistics on the tax take and litigation outcomes for 2023/24, Zoe and Tanja discuss VAT and the Clapham omnibus, two VAT-related developments in the EU and the Supreme Court’s decision in Centrica on the deductibility of M&A advisers’ fees as expenses of management.

Join Tanja Velling, co-host of our Tax News podcast and Tax Partners, Dominic Robertson and Charles Osborne, as they discuss the unallowable purpose rule, one of the UK's restrictions on companies deducting interest when calculating profits subject to corporation tax.

This episode dives into:

• How this rule disallows interest deductions where a company’s borrowing is for a main tax avoidance purpose; and
• recent Court of Appeal decisions on what constitutes a main tax avoidance purpose and what this means for taxpayers, particularly in an M&A context.

In this podcast, Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling share thoughts on the IFS publication “The government’s record on tax 2010-24” and HMRC’s estimate of the tax gap for the tax year 2022/23 in the context of Labour’s general election victory.

They also discuss the Court of Appeal’s decisions in JTI on the unallowable purpose rule in the loan relationships regime and Altrad Services on an attempt to create a “magical” uplift in qualifying expenditure for capital allowances, and the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Watts on a gilt strip scheme.

The podcast further touches on wealth taxes, the US Supreme Court decision in Moore and the Australian Full Federal Court decision in PepsiCo (as a follow-on from our special podcast series on international tax disputes), updates from the OECD and the EU’s FASTER proposal on withholding taxes.

In this podcast, Zoe Andrews and Tanja Velling discuss the Upper Tribunal’s decisions in the remuneration trust case Marlborough DP and the VAT classification case Innovative Bites. In considering the latter, Zoe and Tanja also touch on a recent IMF paper with a design proposal for a progressive VAT system.

The podcast further covers the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Hotel La Tour on input tax recovery in respect of deal fees and the Upper Tribunal’s decision in Burlington Loan Management on the application of the purpose test in the UK/Ireland tax treaty and its impact on the secondary debt market.

The upcoming general election in the UK is mentioned only briefly to explain why it is unlikely that there will be a Budget before the middle of September.