The final installment of The Crow series holds its breath and dives into the 2024 reboot that inspired the series in the first place. When the first 2024 trailer was dropped, it marked the only time Kyle marched into his studio and recorded a "reaction" podcast(something Kyle prides himself on never doing). It was there that the MWP Crow series was born. The hosts express their disappointment with the film's failure to capture the essence of the original, highlighting how it lacks the compelling character development and emotional weight that made the 1994 version a classic. As they dissect the film's plot, pacing, and character motivations, they point out that the reboot feels more like a generic action movie, drawing unwarranted comparisons to the beloved original. The conversation reveals a split among the hosts regarding the film's merit, with some leaning towards a more forgiving view while others maintain a critical stance. With engaging banter and insightful commentary, the episode underscores the challenges of rebooting a cherished franchise and the impact of expectations on audience reception.

The discussion centers around The Crow franchise, particularly the latest reboot, which has prompted mixed emotions among the hosts. Kyle expresses his relief at finally wrapping up the Crow series, while Seth shares the challenges of the endeavor, emphasizing that the reboot was essentially an excuse for him to revisit one of his favorite films from 1994. As the conversation unfolds, Kyle critiques the reboot for its lack of originality, insisting that it shouldn't have clung to the original characters' names, Eric Draven and Shelly. The hosts compare the reboot to previous installments, noting how the reboot fails to capture the essence of the original while trying to appeal to a younger audience. Drew suggests that the film could have benefited from a different title altogether, emphasizing that the reboot's reliance on familiar names detracted from its potential to stand alone as a unique story.

As the conversation progresses, the hosts dissect the pacing of the film, lamenting how it takes a significant amount of time before any Crow action occurs. They draw parallels to the original movie, which established the action early on, allowing viewers to invest in the characters and their motivations more deeply. The reboot's slow buildup and emphasis on backstory lead to a lack of emotional investment in the characters, particularly in the romantic relationship between the leads. Despite some positive elements, such as the cinematography and soundtrack, the overall consensus remains that the reboot doesn't live up to the original film's legacy. The conversation concludes with the hosts ranking the films in the franchise, ultimately placing the 1994 Crow at the top, with the reboot falling lower on the list.

The episode effectively captures the hosts' nostalgic reflections on the original Crow film while critiquing the latest reboot for its shortcomings. Their discussion delves into themes of originality, character development, and the challenges of reimagining a beloved franchise. The hosts' camaraderie and humor shine through as they navigate their differing opinions, leading to a thoughtful exploration of what makes a film truly resonate with audiences. Each host brings their unique perspective to the conversation, resulting in an engaging dialogue about the Crow franchise's past, present, and future.

Takeaways:

• The podcast discusses the Crow franchise, wrapping up its commentary on the reboot.
• Listeners are led through a comparison of the Crow reboot to its predecessors.
• The hosts share personal experiences and views on the evolution of the Crow series.
• Critiques focus on the choice of names and character development in the reboot.
• There is a significant discussion about how the setting and lighting impact the...

The Crow: Wicked Prayer is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made, and this podcast episode dives deep into its myriad flaws and absurdities. The hosts dissect the film's lack of coherent plot, poor performances, and bewildering decisions, such as a supposedly satanic cult that feels more like a community potluck than a menacing group. They highlight how the movie fails to capture the dark, gritty essence of the original Crow series, instead opting for a bright, uninviting desert backdrop that detracts from the story. With tongue-in-cheek humor, they explore the ridiculousness of the characters and their motivations, ultimately concluding that the film is a train wreck that somehow manages to be entertaining in its ineptitude. Join the hosts as they reflect on the cinematic disaster that is Wicked Prayer, offering a blend of laughter and exasperation at the film's many shortcomings.

The Crow Wicked Prayer, often regarded as one of the worst films ever made, serves as the focal point of this engaging podcast episode that delves into the depths of cinematic failure. The hosts—Kyle, Seth, and Drew—embark on a critical analysis of the film's numerous shortcomings, from its disjointed plot to abysmal performances. With Edward Furlong leading a cast that includes Tara Reid and Danny Trejo, the discussion highlights how the movie fails to capture the essence of the beloved original Crow film. The trio reflects on the absurdity of the film's premise, where a cult seeks to resurrect Satan, leading to a series of laughable moments that transform the viewing experience into a dark comedy. As they dissect the film's themes, they ponder how the narrative could have benefitted from a more cohesive script and a deeper understanding of the source material, ultimately concluding that even the absurdity of the film does not redeem it from being a complete failure.

Takeaways:

• The Crow Wicked Prayer is widely regarded as one of the worst films ever made, earning a 0% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.
• The characters in Wicked Prayer lack depth and development, with the villains overshadowing the protagonist.
• The film's cinematography fails to capture the essence of the original Crow movies, lacking any stylistic flair.
• Tara Reid's performance as a satanic cult member was criticized for lack of authenticity and skill.
• The plot of Wicked Prayer was so disjointed that even the hosts struggled to summarize it coherently.
• The discussion highlighted how the film's poor writing and direction detracted from its potential as a cult classic.

Have you been saved? Kyle, Seth, and Drew delve into the third installment of "The Crow" series, "The Crow: Salvation," highlighting its surprisingly positive reception compared to its predecessor, "City of Angels." The hosts discuss how the film successfully redeemed itself even with its straight-to-DVD status, with interesting character arcs and some standout performances, particularly from then-unknown Walton Goggins and Tim Decay. They explore the film's unique approach to the crow's resurrection powers, noting the creative twist with the character's mask and the overall aesthetic choices that set it apart from the earlier entries. Despite some criticisms regarding the lack of depth in the villains and the film's pacing, the hosts appreciate the entertaining moments and the thematic elements of revenge and justice. Ultimately, they conclude that "The Crow: Salvation" offers a refreshing take within the franchise, even if it doesn't reach the heights of the original film.

A captivating dissection of 'The Crow: Salvation' unfolds as the hosts of the Movie Wars podcast — Kyle, Seph, and Drew — embark on an exploration of this sequel's narrative and thematic depths. The conversation kicks off with a focus on the film's central character, Alex Corvus, as portrayed by Eric Mabius. The hosts examine his journey from wrongful execution to seeking vengeance, discussing the moral implications of resurrection and revenge. They highlight the performances of young Kirsten Dunst and Walton Goggins, noting how their talent brings a level of gravitas to the film that elevates it despite its flaws. The hosts admire Goggins’ portrayal of a corrupt cop, offering a nuanced perspective on the character's motivations and the film's critique of systemic corruption.

As the dialogue progresses, the hosts delve into the film's visual presentation, contrasting it with the original Crow and its sequel. They critique the cinematography, particularly the color grading and overall aesthetic, which they feel detracts from the film's potential. The discussion brings to light how the film's lower budget may have limited its creative execution, leading to a less engaging visual experience. They also reflect on the film’s pacing and structure, acknowledging the struggle to maintain tension and interest in the latter half of the film. This analysis is punctuated with humor and shared anecdotes, making for an entertaining and enlightening listening experience.

Toward the conclusion of the episode, the hosts ponder the legacy of 'The Crow: Salvation' within the franchise. They express a shared hope for a future reboot, one that could potentially reconcile the narrative and aesthetic inconsistencies of the sequels while honoring the original's legacy. This episode stands as a testament to the hosts' ability to blend critical analysis with humor, providing listeners with a rich understanding of the film and its place in cinematic history. Their engaging banter and thoughtful reflections ensure that fans of the series will find this discussion both informative and entertaining.

Takeaways:

• The podcast discusses the evolution of the crow franchise, highlighting the differences in tone and quality among the sequels.
• Listeners learn about the creative decisions behind the crow's mask design, which deviates from previous films.
• The hosts express their enjoyment of the unexpected car crash scene, praising its execution and impact.
• There's a strong emphasis on character development, particularly in the portrayal of villains across the series.
• The discussion reveals insights into the actors' performances, noting how they handled their roles despite a weak script.
• The hosts critique the lack of cohesive world-building in the third installment, arguing it affects the overall narrative.