Former DOJ criminal prosecutor Alex Grant reacts to the news that the Trump attempted assassination investigation was hampered by the encryption on the shooter's phone. Alex laments that law enforcement is still dealing with this encryption issue, even after a judge issues a search warrant. This is eight years after the San Bernardino terrorist attack and a locked iPhone pitted the FBI against Apple. Alex also talks about how this was a recurring problem in serious criminal cases he investigated.

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump's executive action banning bump stocks, a device that allowed the Las Vegas shooter to convert a semi-automatic rifle into a functional machine gun. Former DOJ prosecutor Alex Grant explains how the six-person conservative majority's fidelity to textualism overrode the liberals' competing textual argument and defeated Congress's intent in passing the machine gun statute.

Former DOJ criminal prosecutor Alex Grant explains how the jury instructions contained a fatal flaw that should lead to a reversal of the Trump verdict on appeal. The prosecution's burden of proof included showing that Trump acted willfully, and Judge Merchan completely failed to explain the legal meaning of willfully, which is very different from its everyday meaning. That's reversible error.

Former DOJ criminal prosecutor Alex Grant talks about a few things that were off kilter about the closing arguments in the hush money trial. The defense had no opportunity to respond and the prosecution went on for five hours, a test of endurance for the jury. And he talks about some typical dirty tricks the defense engaged in, and the conundrum that the prosecution faces in trying to respond to them.

As Judge Merchan prepares to give the jury instructions in Trump's hush money trial, he is making a fateful decision on what the prosecution must prove about Trump's culpable state of mind. In this episode, former DOJ prosecutor Alex Grant breaks down this crucial issue that could lead to the nightmare scenario of a guilty verdict followed by a reversal on appeal if Judge Merchan gets this wrong. Alex explains that the New York false records statute requires the prosecution to meet the difficult standard of willfulness in order to convict Trump of the felonies charged in the indictment.

President Trump's motion to dismiss the New York hush money case for an alleged failure to disclose information about the star witness Michael Cohen revealed that the DA's office did not have the full story on Cohen when it indicted the case. The DA's office only received part of the documents it wanted from the federal prosecutors who had previously charged Cohen and had refused to charge Trump. It was only after Trump subpoenaed the U.S. Attorney's office that Trump--and the DA's office--got all the potential impeachment information on Cohen. Former 23-year DOJ criminal prosecutor Alex Grant explains why time pressure probably led the DA's office to take the risky step of charging the case and waiting to see what else there was that could damage Cohen's credibility.

Former DOJ prosecutor Alex Grant talks about why having four Trump prosecutions at the same time with no coordinated prosecution strategy is a problem. Alex explains that this is a departure from the DOJ playbook in big cases, and it may lead to the Stormy Daniels hush money case in New York state court being the only case going to verdict before the November election. Normally DOJ headquarters would be quarterbacking these cases. Alex discusses why there is a lack of strong leadership and why it matters.

Former DOJ prosecutor Alex Grant explains what traditional media sources totally missed about the Supreme Court's decision to take Trump's presidential immunity appeal. He explains that there is another pending Supreme Court appeal that was already holding up the trial in the January 6 case. Alex discusses the work that the Supreme Court is going to have to do to distinguish a 1982 case, Nixon v Fitzgerald, that extended absolute presidential immunity from civil lawsuits. Finally, he talks about how the special counsel's prior tactical decisions made the Supreme Court's decision to accept the appeal virtually a foregone conclusion.