• "Ballot Battleground: Pennsylvania's Provisional Puzzle in the Wake of Flawed Mail-In Votes"

  • Oct 29 2024
  • Length: 3 mins
  • Podcast

"Ballot Battleground: Pennsylvania's Provisional Puzzle in the Wake of Flawed Mail-In Votes"

Listen for free

View show details

  • Summary

  • A legal tussle begins in Pennsylvania over the handling of provisional ballots in the recently conducted election. The matter caught national attention as it involved the Republican National Committee and indirectly, former President Donald Trump. The Republican National Committee (RNC) filed what is being hailed as an innovative lawsuit, invoking an 'independent state legislature theory' and an attempt to apply the Purcell principle to state courts.

    This lawsuit may seem like a technicality but holds an enormous amount of weight in the world of election law and by extension, American politics. At the heart of this innovative argument is a dispute over how ballots are managed and counted following an election, a point of contention consistently brought up by Donald Trump during his term.

    The core of the issue revolves around the mismanaged or flawed mailed ballots which resulted in a substantial increase in the use of provisional ballots in the election. These ballots are usually the last resort for situations where an individual's eligibility to vote is disputed, or their name is not listed at their polling station. The RNC is alleging that these were wrongly handled leading to a skewed election result.

    The legal action embarked on by the RNC is seen as an attempt to test new legal waters, with their action having profound implications for future elections. The concept of 'independent state legislature theory' is not commonly applied in election law. The theory artfully suggests that state constitutions may not impinge on state legislature’s control over federal election procedures. This could potentially shape, limit, or even dismiss the power of state courts in deciding particular electoral matters.

    Moreover, the RNC also seeks to bring the Purcell legal principle into state elections. A principle that generally holds that courts should avoid changing election rules too close to an election, to prevent confusion and discrepancies in the electoral process.

    The crux of the RNC's legal move is their inherent request for a sequestration of the ballots in question until the courts have made a conclusive decision. The move could provide an opportunity to scrutinise how many of the counted ballots may have been illegitimate, reworking the final vote counts and potentially altering election outcomes.

    The present legal action may well open a completely new chapter in the judicial handling of electoral disputes. This controversy extends beyond Donald Trump and his political career. It underlines an ongoing struggle over the sanctity and fairness of the electoral process, a topic that will undeniably continue to dominate election law for years to come and one that all Americans, regardless of political affiliation, have a vested interest in.
    Show More Show Less
Show More Show Less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about "Ballot Battleground: Pennsylvania's Provisional Puzzle in the Wake of Flawed Mail-In Votes"

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.

Audible.co.uk reviews

Amazon reviews
No Reviews are Available