• 4 - A Junk Science

  • Oct 4 2024
  • Length: 17 mins
  • Podcast

  • Summary

  • Forensically speaking, blood spatter analysis isn’t the most reliable. Delve further into the details with Kylie and Rory this week as they discuss the forensic bind between the legal cases of Warren, Tim, and David. Also hear about one of the (in Kylie’s opinion) worst so-called experts we’ve encountered in our journey so far.

    Content warnings - lots of blood talk, murder
    https://www.transformationsnetwork.com/post/8-online-mental-health-resources-anyone-can-access

    References:
    http://www.wcojp.org/bevel-credibility.html
    https://www.bevelgardner.com/expertshttps://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/05/31/magazine/bloodstain-pattern-analysis-timeline.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloodstain_pattern_analysis
    https://www.propublica.org/article/joe-bryans-attorneys-ask-for-new-trial-say-murder-conviction-built-on-faulty-forensics
    https://features.propublica.org/blood-spatter/joe-bryan-conviction-blood-spatter-forensic-evidence/
    https://signalscv.com/2021/07/blood-spatter-familial-matters-in-cierzan-murder-trial/
    https://www.forensicsciencesimplified.org/blood/
    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/expert_witnesshttps://investigatinginnocenceblog.com/tag/rod-englert/
    https://darliefacts.com/blood-evidence/
    https://seoklaw.com/legal-news/the-innocent-man-the-story-of-ronald-williamson/
    https://innocenceproject.org/cases/dennis-fritz/
    And Justice For None, The life and death of an innocent man. By Mary Ann West.
    https://abcnews4.com/news/local/murdaugh-wants-forensic-analyst-barred-from-testifying-about-blood-spatter-in-murder-trial
    https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/25/us/alex-murdaugh-trial-names/index.html
    Show More Show Less
activate_Holiday_promo_in_buybox_DT_T2

What listeners say about 4 - A Junk Science

Average customer ratings

Reviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.