Listen free for 30 days
Listen with offer
-
Who Killed Truth?
- A History of Evidence
- Narrated by: Jill Lepore
- Length: 13 hrs and 35 mins
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
Summary
Many historians and cultural observers argue we live in a post-truth world—but if truth is dead, who killed it? And how did it die? Join celebrated historian Jill Lepore as she cracks the case by examining key moments in the history of truth, doubt, and evidence across the last century.
In Who Killed Truth? acclaimed Harvard historian and New Yorker staff writer Jill Lepore traces the origins of our current post-truth crisis. In a series of spellbinding stories, Lepore investigates murders, hoaxes, lies and delusions to reckon with the instability of truth and fiction in the twenty-first century. Listeners will follow Lepore through a fascinating, erudite, and antic journey through the thorny problem of how we know what we know, and why it seems sometimes as if we don't know anything at all anymore.
Revisiting key moments in U.S. history—from the Scopes Monkey Trial in 1925 to the 1977 National Women’s Convention to the first election predicted by computer, and more—Lepore uncovers the secrets of the past the way a detective might, hot on the trail of the killer of truth.
Please note: This collection includes content that has been previously released in The Last Archive podcast.
What listeners say about Who Killed Truth?
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- stephen15059
- 06-01-24
Well performed and enjoyable. Not a history of evidence.
An interesting collection of qnecdotes and archive stories that are well picked and well told but it doesn’t deliver on the question in the title or give much in the way of a general history of evidence or really engage with that as a structured thesis. Enjoyable nonetheless but not what I thought it might be from the opening.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!