Theory and Reality
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £20.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Matthew Lloyd Davies
About this listen
How does science work? Does it tell us what the world is "really" like? What makes it different from other ways of understanding the universe? In Theory and Reality, Peter Godfrey-Smith addresses these questions by taking the listener on a grand tour of 100 years of debate about science. The result is a completely accessible introduction to the main themes of the philosophy of science.
Intended for undergraduates and general audiences with no prior background in philosophy, Theory and Reality covers logical positivism; the problems of induction and confirmation; Karl Popper's theory of science; Thomas Kuhn and "scientific revolutions"; the views of Imre Lakatos, Larry Laudan, and Paul Feyerabend; and challenges to the field from sociology of science, feminism, and science studies. The book then looks in more detail at some specific problems and theories, including scientific realism, the theory-ladeness of observation, scientific explanation, and Bayesianism.
Finally, Godfrey-Smith defends a form of philosophical naturalism as the best way to solve the main problems in the field.
©2003 The University of Chicago (P)2017 TantorCritic reviews
What listeners say about Theory and Reality
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Anonymous User
- 01-02-24
Incredible work, also with PDF free on the internet
This is really high quality work. I am amazed that Godfrey-Smith managed to provide it for free both in audio and PDF on the internet (so you can listen and pick certain parts in case you want add a reference in your work). The subject is deep, but the author was very clear. The narrator was sustained the greatness of the work with perfect performance. I loved the book
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Jim Vaughan
- 07-08-21
Wide Ranging and Engaging, but Maybe Opinionated.
What I liked about this book was its breadth, covering not just the philosophical underpinnings of Science, but also the social and sociological aspects. Having said that, the book is a bit of a “personal opinion”, with the authors views sometimes distorting the account.
For example, Godfrey-Smiths rather dismissive description of Lakatos is a travesty of Lakatos’ project as a progressive synthesis on Popper and Kuhn. Does an anomalous result such as deviations in the predicted orbit of Uranus, ‘falsify’ Newton/Kepler or can we legitimately posit an ‘auxiliary hypothesis’ of a yet undiscovered planet (ie. Neptune) as explanation? When do such ‘protective belts’ merely prolong the life of a doubtful ‘degenerate’ theory, and when are they genuinely ‘progressive’ and lead to further discovery? This seems an important refinement, not to be dismissed.
The book is well narrated, never dull, and neatly organised in sections, so it could be taught as the basis of a course. IMHO, anyone working or interested in science will benefit from an appreciation of the philosophical and sociological context supporting modern science.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- J. Jong
- 07-01-20
Excellent intro to philosophy of science, and nuanced defence of scientific realism
Peter Godfrey-Smith is a philosopher of biologist and philosopher of science; this book was based on his university lecturers, and this show, though not necessarily in a bad way. It’s most useful as a historical survey of philosophy of science, especially from the Vienna Circle to Popper to Kuhn to Lakatos and Laudan to van Fraassen. Godfrey-Smith ends up defending a very austere and humble version of scientific realism, influenced by BvF. The level of austerity is sometimes hard to pin down.
The narration was appropriate: English (though the author is Australian), professorial, a little clipped.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
7 people found this helpful
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Lee
- 15-03-22
Enjoyed...
... immensely.
This is another book to re-read; it covers issues I will no doubt be pondering for some time to come.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- JCM
- 31-08-23
Decent introduction
Most histories of philosophy seem to end in the mid-20th century. That's pretty much where this one starts. Works for me.
Mostly pretty easy to follow (except where it started banging on about probability equations, which are hard enough to follow in print, let alone audio), even when some of the concepts were entirely new to me, as many were. Popper I'm semi-familiar with (though put me on the spot and my memory's so bad I'd struggle to summarise his views), and was aware of Kuhn and his concept of scientific revolutions (and the seriously overused paradigm shift), but Lakatos, Laudan, and Feyerabend were all new to me.
Some interesting ideas in here for the ignorant, in other words. Good for beginners.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!