The Smear
How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think, and How You Vote
Failed to add items
Add to basket failed.
Add to wishlist failed.
Remove from wishlist failed.
Adding to library failed
Follow podcast failed
Unfollow podcast failed
£0.00 for first 30 days
Buy Now for £12.99
No valid payment method on file.
We are sorry. We are not allowed to sell this product with the selected payment method
-
Narrated by:
-
Sharyl Attkisson
-
By:
-
Sharyl Attkisson
About this listen
Ever wonder how politics turned into a take-no-prisoners blood sport? The New York Times best-selling author of Stonewalled pulls back the curtain on the shady world of opposition research and reveals the dirty tricks those in power use to influence your opinions.
Behind most major political stories in the modern era, there is an agenda - an effort by opposition researchers, spin doctors, and outside interests to destroy an idea or a person. The tactic they use is the Smear. Every day, Americans are influenced by the Smear without knowing it. Paid forces cleverly shape virtually every image you cross. Maybe you read that Donald Trump is a racist misogynist or saw someone on the news mocking the Bernie Sanders campaign. The trick of the Smear is that it is often based on some shred of truth, but these media-driven "hit pieces" are designed to obscure the truth. Success hinges on the Smear artist's ability to remain invisible, to make it seem as if their work is neither calculated nor scripted. It must appear to be precisely what it is not.
Veteran journalist Sharyl Attkisson has witnessed this practice firsthand. After years of being pitched hit jobs and puff pieces, she's an expert at detecting Smear campaigns. Now, the hard-hitting investigative reporter shares her inside knowledge, revealing how the Smear takes shape and who its perpetrators are - including Clinton confidant Sidney Blumenthal and, most influential of all, "right-wing assassin turned left-wing assassin" (National Review) political operative David Brock and his Media Matters for America empire.
Attkisson exposes the diabolical tactics of Smear artists and their outrageous access to the biggest names in political media - operatives who are corrupting the political process and discouraging widespread citizen involvement in our democracy.
©2017 Sharyl Attkisson (P)2017 HarperCollins PublishersWhat listeners say about The Smear
Average customer ratingsReviews - Please select the tabs below to change the source of reviews.
-
Overall
-
Performance
-
Story
- Mr. Steve Hill
- 29-11-17
Insightful, but partisan guide to smear tactics
An insightful guide to some of the underhand tactics used by political lobby groups. But . Attkisson appears to live in a parallel universe where Fox News upholds the traditions of ‘fair and balanced’ journalism.
Incredibly, Fox and its commentators such as Hannity and Beck are painted not as aggressors, but as helpless victims of organised smears from a range of what she considers to be ‘left wing’ groups.
I’m not sure what the author has been smoking, but the likes of Media Matters (a moderate non-profit research group) and the New York Times are only calling out what are blatant lies and racism in the right wing US media. Their tactics actually are pretty mild, yet Attkison appears to believe these so-called ‘left wings’ groups are a real threat to democracy and are on a mission to destroy freedom of speech.
She appears to genuinely believe that 99% of US media is left wing, and its pretty much just Fox News alone who provide reliable news. Comically, the only time Fox gets any flack is because they invited Media Matters to appear on the network.
Oh yes, she also doesn’t like it when Fox don’t have not enough Trump supporting cheerleaders on!
You couldn’t make it up! At times you will wonder whether the author, who reads her own work on this audio book, is actually being serious. Is it some sort of joke?
The odd thing is the book isn’t without merit. It is well researched in places and presents an interesting look at smear tactics - but it is written through a highly partisan prism which undermines much of its credibility.
Make if it what you will, but this is not a serious academic study.
Something went wrong. Please try again in a few minutes.
You voted on this review!
You reported this review!
3 people found this helpful