Amazing Insight into the Plague

A really eye opening listen that puts you in the mind of someone during epidemic. listening to someone who dosent understand germ theory theories about the disease is great, if a little dry in parts.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

4 people found this helpful

Whoa!

This is on my Uni reading list and I honestly couldn't think of anything more depressing than reading a book about the plague, but I love this book! I feel like I lived through it all. Horrifying realism and brilliantly read.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

9 people found this helpful

Pandemic reading

A journalist in the Guardian noted the similarities of the populaces behaviour in this book with some actions in the Covid Pandemic. I think the performance highlights the occasional naiveté of the narrator's trust in authority figures, contrasted with queries about the numbers succumbing to the plague. Tables summarised in audio form don't really work to maintain flow of the overall narrative, and this book has quite a few tables! I thin it remains an appropriate read, regardless whether readers think it a novel or a more accurate account of events.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Epidemic and human nature

I would probably have rated this book less highly before Covid-19 arrived., though I have read about the Black Death and “Spanish” flu before this pandemic.
Defoe was but a wee boy when this plague epidemic occurred but it seems believable that he had an account by an older relative on which to draw, and has obviously done considerable research, far more than expected of a historical novelist then, and even now.

The plague is a far more deadly, infectious, and ghastly disease than the present pandemic, but nevertheless many of the measures taken to contain it and the behaviour of the population are now familiar to us. The destruction of the economy of London, and consequently of England was severe. All non-essential businesses collapsed. European trade was impossible.
Of course, as usual, the wealthy fled at the first hint of threat, the affluent stockpiled the necessities of life, and the poor tried to stay alive.
The authorities in London, however, did not flinch, and stayed to mitigate as best they could the disaster that had overwhelmed their city.
The reactions of the citizens weren’t very different from those we’ve seen this year, from panic to complacency, from denial to pseudoscience, from evasion of regulation to altruism.
Rumours and misinformation managed to spread even without newspapers and social media.
I don’t usually have much time for Defoe, English spy and agent provocateur in pre-1707 Scotland, but his analysis of the Plague Year reveals intelligence and a wisdom I have to concede, grudgingly.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

2 people found this helpful

Ground zero of a pandemic

The Plague year in question is 1665, directly before the sequel tribulation of the great fire. Our narrator HF, whose journals were adapted by the writer, tells it as he sees it, and there unsettling echoes of our current Coronavirus pandemic: there is confusion and mixed messages as the plague spreads from abroad, failed containment measures, and then escalating notifications of cases and the dead, here reproduced in 'bills' where now we are notified by our breaking news app.
And there are the 'social isolation' measures of the time, perhaps one of the most painful controversial measures taken then; that of containing the infected household locked up and guarded in their houses. The chronicler argues that given, as now, that the plague was most efficaciously spread that those who were non-symptomatic, this measure had limited value.
There are chilling descriptions of plague pits, including horrible scenes of people throwing themselves into them alive, haunted by the bereaved, and of the symptoms, the 'tokens,' tumours, swellings and vomiting.
There are fascinating descriptions of the roles created to seek out those who were infected, diagnose, and eventually dispose of the dead. There are insights into the role of medical practice, both 'quackery' and the best guess science of the time, and of religion. There are fools, cowards and knaves as well as good people doing their best.
In one of the more gripping parts of the narrative, we follow the progress of a group escaping the city from the country, attempting settlements, and trying to overcome the hostility of suspicious and scared rural communities.
Its a shame then that given all this, I struggled to pay attention to a lot of this audio-book and kept tuning out. It is because that for me a lot of the real human interest stuff is buried in a lot of dry reporting. The narrator seems distanced from events, given that he is reporting first hand, and we don't get much of a measure of the impact of him and his own family and loved ones. He talks about his feelings and his faith, but he is hard person to get to know. The narrator, Andrew Cullum, reads clearly and does their best with a lot of this dry material.
Quite possibly, this is better to read than it is to listen to.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

9 people found this helpful

Fascinating slice of history

I listened to this during the current Coronavirus pandemic, it's great for putting things in perspective. On one hand, science and medicine have improved hugely since 1665, but human nature, for better or worse, is still largely the same.

The journal covers a wide variety of subjects: stories of individual people's experiences; the author's firsthand experiences from his neighbourhood and from walks around London; descriptions and criticism of the official response; theories about the cause and origins of the plague and discussion of how doctors (and quacks) tried to treat it. Sometimes amusing, sometimes heartbreaking, always interesting.

The journal is well written and well narrated. The only problem with this recording is the frequent bills of mortality - there's no easy way to narrate a table, but the information is important to the narrative and just hearing a list of statistics doesn't work for me. I found that after listening for a few hours I would look at the relevant tables online (on Project Gutenberg's copy of the journal) to get an overview of the bills I'd just heard.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

3 people found this helpful